Abstract
Recent econometric evidence has noticeably changed views on the desirability and the appropriate design of explicit Deposit Insurance Schemes (DIS). The purpose of this paper is to take a second look at the data. After surveying recent empirical work and providing a theoretical framework, we argue that existing studies may suffer from a selection bias. Building on a new database on explicit deposit insurance compiled by the author, we perform a variety of semi-parametric and parametric tests to see whether and how explicit deposit insurance (de)stabilizes banking systems. We find that the evidence indeed suggests that a selection bias is present. Controlling for this bias leads to a reassessment of recent studies. In particular, making deposit insurance explicit has a rather moderate and, if any, stabilizing effect on the probability of experiencing a systemic crisis.
Dokumententyp: | Paper |
---|---|
Keywords: | Deposit Insurance ; Banking Fragility ; Systemic Risk |
Fakultät: | Volkswirtschaft
Volkswirtschaft > Munich Discussion Papers in Economics Volkswirtschaft > Munich Discussion Papers in Economics > Finanzmärkte |
Themengebiete: | 300 Sozialwissenschaften > 300 Sozialwissenschaft, Soziologie
300 Sozialwissenschaften > 330 Wirtschaft |
JEL Classification: | C14, G21, G28 |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-662-8 |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 662 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 30. Jun. 2005 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 05. Nov. 2020, 09:34 |