Abstract
Engelmann and Strobel (AER 2004) question the relevance of inequity aversion in simple dictator game experiments claiming that a combination of a preference for efficiency and a Rawlsian motive for helping the least well-off is more important than inequity aversion. We show that these results are partly based on a strong subject pool effect. The participants of the E&S experiments were undergraduate students of economics and business administration who self-selected into their field of study (economics) and learned in the first semester that efficiency is desirable. We show that for non-economists the preference for efficiency is much less pronounced. We also find a non-negligible gender effect indicating that women are more egalitarian than men. However, perhaps surprisingly, the dominance of equality over efficiency is unrelated to political attitudes.
Item Type: | Paper |
---|---|
Keywords: | Social Preferences; Inequity Aversion; Efficiency Preferences |
Faculties: | Economics Economics > Munich Discussion Papers in Economics Economics > Munich Discussion Papers in Economics > Behavioral Economics Economics > Munich Discussion Papers in Economics > Game Theory Economics > Chairs > Seminar for Economic Theory |
Subjects: | 300 Social sciences > 300 Social sciences, sociology and anthropology 300 Social sciences > 330 Economics |
JEL Classification: | C7, C91, C92, D63, D64 |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-725-8 |
Language: | English |
Item ID: | 725 |
Date Deposited: | 13. Nov 2005 |
Last Modified: | 04. Nov 2020, 18:25 |