Abstract
Consumers regularly have to choose between a pay-per-use and a flat-rate option. Due to the increasing number and range of (digital) services, the frequency at which consumers have to make tariff-choice decisions to use these services has become even more prevalent. Prior work has demonstrated that consumers’ tariff choices are often systematically biased and identified overconfidence as one of the key drivers. Yet, prior research is non-experimental and focused on the so-called flat-rate bias. By contrast, we examine the effects of overconfidence on the choice between a pay-per-use and a flat-rate option using an experimental approach. We develop an incentive-compatible experiment to provide causal evidence for the effect of overconfidence on tariff-choice decisions. We find that overconfident (underconfident) consumers underestimate (overestimate) their actual usage, which leads them to choose a pay-per-use (flat-rate) option relatively more frequently. Based on the results, we discuss theoretical and managerial implications as well as avenues for future research.
Dokumententyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
---|---|
Publikationsform: | Publisher's Version |
Keywords: | Overconfidence; Tariff choice; Pay-per-use; Flat-rate; Experiment |
Fakultät: | Betriebswirtschaft > Institut für Electronic Commerce und Digitale Märkte |
Themengebiete: | 300 Sozialwissenschaften > 330 Wirtschaft |
JEL Classification: | M31, D91, D12, D84, C90 |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-75364-2 |
ISSN: | 1863-6683 |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 75364 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 18. Mrz. 2021, 12:44 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 11. Mai 2022, 09:12 |