[PDF, 556kB]
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to explore this argument. In this paper I will focus on feminist interpretations of the neo-Victorian mode of contemporary historical fiction, as written by female authors. First, I will therefore give an overview of what neo-Victorianism in literature is and explore reasons and explanations for why the return to the Victorian period in modern-day fiction is frequent and how its cultural relevance and this ‘return to the past’ can (re-)shape the definition of self. Second, I will focus on the conditions under which the 19th century re-appears in and continues to inform our globalized present through female-written literature. Feminist theories will be included in the discussion to understand why neo-Victorian historical fiction is an important medium for female writers to project a critique of bygone times into the present. This will entail a detailed analysis of Belinda Starling’s 2006 novel The Journal of Dora Damage, touching on and drawing comparisons to other works. I will furthermore explore how Starling contrasts a young Victorian heroine – who is submerged in the time’s restrictive gender roles and strict sexual codes – with Victorian pornography and sexuality. Lastly, I will discuss how this, in turn, can be interpreted as a drive for self-knowledge and an even parodic attempt to shape the future by returning to the past – or if such an ambitious approach is even possible.
Dokumententyp: | Hochschulschrift (Bachelorarbeit) |
---|---|
Keywords: | Neo-Victorianism, Post-Victorian, Postmodernism, feminism, parody, historical fiction, definition of self, female authorship, Victorian, Belinda Starling, The Journal of Dora Damage, Sarah Waters, gender roles, pornography |
Fakultät: | Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaften > Department 3 |
Themengebiete: | 800 Literatur > 800 Literatur, Rhetorik, Literaturwissenschaft
800 Literatur > 820 Englische, altenglische Literaturen |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-75468-9 |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 75468 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 07. Apr. 2021, 06:59 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 07. Apr. 2021, 07:00 |
Literaturliste: | Abrams, Lynn. 2001. “Ideals of Womanhood in Victorian Britain” in BBC History Trails, Victorian Britain. http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/trail/victorian_britain/women_home/ideals_womanhood_01.shtml, pp. 1–9. Accessed 2 July 2020. Attwood, Feona. 2009. “Introduction: The Sexualization of Culture”, Mainstreaming Sex: The Sexualization of Western Culture. London: I.B. Tauris, pp. xiii–xxiv. “bindery, n.” OED Online, Oxford University Press, June 2020, www.oed.com/view/Entry/19123. Accessed 3 June 2020. Boehm-Schnitker, Nadine and Susanne Gruss. 2014. Neo-Victorian Literature and Culture: Immersions and Revisitations. London: Routledge. Burstein, Miriam. “Rules for Writing Neo-Victorian Novels.” The Little Professor, 15 Mar. 2006, https://littleprofessor.typepad.com/the_little_professor/2006/03/rules_for_writi.html. Accessed 20 May 2020. Cooper, Katherine and Emma Short. 2012. The Female Figure in Contemporary Historical Fiction, edited by Katherine Cooper and Emma Short, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. Faber, Michael. 2002. The Crimson Petal and the White. Edinburgh: Canongate. “feminism, n.” OED Online, Oxford University Press, www.oed.com/view/Entry/69192. Accessed 24 June 2020. Fleishman, Avrom. 1971. The English Historical Novel: Walter Scott to Virginia Woolf. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press. Foucault, Michel. 1973. “Seeing and Knowing.” The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception. New York: Pantheon Books, pp. 107–123. Fowles, John. 1977. The French Lieutenant’s Woman. Suffolk: Triad/Granada. Genz, Stéphanie. 2006. “Third Way/ve: The Politics of Postfeminism.” Feminist Theory 7:3, 2006, pp. 333–353. Glover, David and Cora Kaplan. 2000. Genders. New York: Taylor & Francis Group. Gutleben, Christian. 2001. Nostalgic Postmodernism: The Victorian Tradition and the Contemporary British Novel. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Heilmann, Ann, and Mark Llewellyn. 2010. Neo-Victorianism: The Victorians in the Twenty-First Century, 1999–2009. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. Henry, Astrid. 2004. Not My Mother’s Sister: Generational Conflict and Third-Wave Feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Hutcheon, Linda.1985. A Theory of Parody: The Teachings of Twentieth-Century Art Forms. London: Methuen. ---. 1991. [1988]. A Poetics of Postmodernism. New York: London: Routledge. Jameson, Fredric. 1991. Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press. ---. 1983. “Postmodernism and Consumer Society.” The Anti-Aesthetics: Essays on Postmodern Culture, edited by Hal Foster, Washington: Bay Press, pp. 111–125. Kucich, John and Dianne F. Sadoff. 2000. Victorian Afterlife: Postmodern Culture Rewrites the Nineteenth Century, edited by John Kucich, and Dianne F. Sadoff, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. King, Jeanette. 2005. The Victorian Woman Question in Contemporary Feminist Fiction. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. Kohlke, Marie-Luise. “‘De Corporis et Libri Fabrica’: Review of Belinda Starling, The Journal of Dora Damage.” Neo-Victorian Studies 1:1, 2008a, pp. 196–202. ---. 2008b. The Neo-Victorian Sexsation: Literary Excursions into the Nineteenth Century Erotic. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.621.2941&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed May 15 2020. ---. “Feminist Awakenings: Review of Essie Fox’s Elijah’s Mermaid and Stevie Davies’ Awakening.” Neo-Victorian Studies 6:2, 2013, pp. 207–222. Loesberg, Jonathan. “The Afterlife of Victorian Sexuality: Foucault and Neo- Victorian Historical Fiction.” CLIO 36:3, 2007, pp. 361–389. Lutyens, Mary. 1967. Millais and the Ruskins. London: John Murray. Lyotard, Jean-François. 1979. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press. McNair, Brian. 2002. Striptease Culture: Sex, Media and the Democratization of Desire. London: Routledge. Miller, Michelle. 2008. Branding Miss G: Third Wave Feminists and the Media. Toronto: Sumach Press. Mitchell, Kate. 2010. History and Cultural Memory in Neo-Victorian Fiction: Victorian Afterlives. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. Muller, Nadine. 2012. “Sexual f(r)ictions: Pornography in Neo-Victorian Women’s Fiction” in The Female Figure in Contemporary Historical Fiction, edited by Katherine Cooper and Emma Short, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 115–133. Mulvey, Laura. 1989. “Visual Pleasure and the Narrative Cinema.” In Visual and Other Pleasures: Theories of Representation and Difference. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. Nikunen, Kaarina, Susanna Paasonen and Laura Saarenmaa. 2007. Pornification: Sex and Sexuality in Media Culture. London: Berg Publishers. Novák, Caterina. “Those Very ‘Other’ Victorians: Interrogating Neo-Victorian Feminism in The Journal of Dora Damage.” Neo-Victorian Studies, 6:2, 2013, pp. 114–136. “Obscene Publications Act”, Encyclopaedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/event/Obscene-Publications-Act, Accessed 18 June 2020. Sartre, Jean Paul. 1956. Being and Nothingness. New York: Philosophical Library. Schabert, Ina. 2006. Englische Literaturgeschichte des 20. Jahrhunderts: Eine neue Darstellung aus der Sicht der Geschlechterforschung. Stuttgart: Kröner. Shuttleworth, Sally. 1998. “Natural History: The Retro-Victorian Novel” in The Third Culture: Literature and Science, edited by Elinor Shaffer, New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 253–268. Senna, Danzy. 1995. “To Be Real”, To Be Real: Telling the Truth and Changing the Face of Feminism, edited by Rebecca Walker, New York: Doubleday, pp. 5–20. Sigel, Lisa Z. 2002. Governing Pleasures: Pornography and Social Change in England, 1815–1914, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. Starling, Belinda. 2008. The Journal of Dora Damage. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. Steven Marcus, 1985. “Freud and Dora: Story, History, Case History”, in Dora’s Case: Freud – Hysteria– Feminism, edited by Charles Bernheimer and Claire Kahane, 2nd ed. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 56–91. Wallace, Diana. 2005. The Woman’s Historical Novel, British Woman Writers 1900–2000, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. “Victoriana, n.” OED Online, Oxford University Press, www.oed.com/view/Entry/223223. Accessed 15 June 2020. “Victorianism, n.” OED Online, Oxford University Press, www.oed.com/view/Entry/223224. Accessed 15 June 2020. |