Abstract
This note critically evaluates the New Classical Macroeconomics from a Marshallian perspective. Revisiting the famous Keynes-Tinbergen controversy, it is argued that Keynes' criticism comprises the "Lucas critique," and that it is misleading to label this a critique of Keynesian economics. The postulate of immutable economic structures carries Tinbergen's approach to the extreme and neglects the possibility of slowly changing structures, as conceived by Marshall. The position is defended by arguments about equilibrium and rationality that are admittedly empty.
Dokumententyp: | Paper |
---|---|
Keywords: | macroeconomics; real business cycles; Lucas critique; Marshall; Keynes; Tinbergen; time-varying coefficients; adaptive estimation; Kalman filter; equilibrium |
Fakultät: | Volkswirtschaft
Volkswirtschaft > Munich Discussion Papers in Economics Volkswirtschaft > Munich Discussion Papers in Economics > Makroökonomik Volkswirtschaft > Munich Discussion Papers in Economics > Geschichte der Lehrmeinungen Volkswirtschaft > Lehrstühle > Seminar für Theorie und Politik der Einkommensverteilung (aufgelöst) |
Themengebiete: | 300 Sozialwissenschaften > 300 Sozialwissenschaft, Soziologie
300 Sozialwissenschaften > 330 Wirtschaft |
JEL Classification: | E1, B22 |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-886-0 |
Ort: | Tübingen |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 886 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 16. Feb. 2006 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 05. Nov. 2020, 12:56 |