
Abstract
A PAYGO system may serve as insurance against not having children and as an enforcement device for ungrateful children who are unwilling to pay their parents a pension. In fact, the latter was Bismarck’s historic motive for introducing this system. It is true that the PAYGO system reduces the investment in human capital, but if it is run on a sufficiently small scale, it may nevertheless bring about a welfare improvement. If, on the other hand, the scale of the system is so large that parents bequeath some of their pensions to their children, it is overdrawn and creates unnecessarily strong disincentives for human capital investment.
Item Type: | Journal article |
---|---|
Journal or Publication Title: | Journal of Public Economics |
Keywords: | Fertility insurance, Human capital investment, Pension system |
Faculties: | Economics > Chairs > Chair for Public Economics Economics |
Subjects: | 300 Social sciences > 300 Social sciences, sociology and anthropology 300 Social sciences > 330 Economics |
JEL Classification: | H55, J1 |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-938-7 |
Language: | English |
Item ID: | 938 |
Date Deposited: | 19. Jun 2006 |
Last Modified: | 04. Nov 2020, 12:45 |