Abstract
In a massive study, Benjamin Ziemer has launched a scathing stricture of redaction criticism in Old Testament studies. Based on comparative material from an impressive range of Ancient Near Eastern, biblical, early Jewish and early Christian literature, he maintains that diachronic research is unable to deliver meaningful reconstructions that reach more than one stage of textual development behind the present biblical text. Moving beyond that boundary would amount to unfettered speculation. While his appraisal is overwhelmingly negative, there is one biblical book on which he endeavors to devise a redaction-critical hypothesis of his own: the book of Jeremiah. The article evaluates Ziemer's theory on Jeremiah and draws some general conclusions regarding the validity of his verdict on traditional redaction-critical research.
Dokumententyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
---|---|
Fakultät: | Katholische Theologie |
Themengebiete: | 200 Religion > 200 Religion |
ISSN: | 0006-2014 |
Sprache: | Deutsch |
Dokumenten ID: | 102350 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 05. Jun. 2023, 15:40 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 18. Okt. 2023, 12:48 |