Limiting Profit Shifting in a Model with Heterogeneous Firm Productivity

Langenmayr, Dominika (November 2011): Limiting Profit Shifting in a Model with Heterogeneous Firm Productivity. Münchener Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Beiträge (VWL) 2011-19

Abstract

This paper analyzes measures that limit firms’ profit shifting activities in a model that incorporates heterogeneous firm productivity and monopolistic competition. Such measures, e.g. thin capitalization rules, have become increasingly widespread as governments have reacted to growing profit shifting activities of multinational companies. However, besides limiting profit shifting, such rules entail costs. As the regulations can only focus on the means to shift profits, not on profit shifting itself, they impose costs on all firms, no matter whether these firms shift profits abroad or not. In the model, these costs force some firms to exit the market. Thus, as this makes the remaining firms more profitable, regulations to limit profit shifting may even increase the aggregate amount of profits shifted abroad. From a welfare point of view, it may even be optimal no to limit profit shifting at all.

• Dokumententyp: Paper
• Keywords: profit shifting, heterogeneous firms, tax competition
• Fakultät: Volkswirtschaft ; Volkswirtschaft > Munich Discussion Papers in Economics
• Themengebiete: 300 Sozialwissenschaften > 300 Sozialwissenschaft, Soziologie ; 300 Sozialwissenschaften > 330 Wirtschaft
• JEL Classification: H25, H73, F23
• Sprache: Englisch

Literaturliste

Axtell, Robert L. (2001) ‘Zipf distribution of U.S. firm sizes.’ Science 293, 1818–1820

Baldwin, Richard, and Toshihiro Okubo (2009a) ‘Tax competition with heterogeneous firms.’ Kobe University (Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration) Discussion Paper Series 237

____(2009b) ‘Tax reform, delocation and heterogeneous firms.’ Scandinavian Journal of Economics 111, 741–764

Buettner, Thiess, Michael Overesch, Ulrich Schreiber, and Georg Wamser (2008) ‘The impact of thin-capitalization rules on multinationals’ financing and investment decisions’

Davies, Ronald, and Carsten Eckel (2010) ‘Tax competition for heterogeneous firms with endogenous entry.’ American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 2, 77–102

Egger, Peter, Wolfgang Eggert, and Hannes Winner (2010) ‘Saving taxes through foreign plant ownership.’ Journal of International Economics 81(1), 99–108

Haufler, Andreas, and Frank Stähler (2009) ‘Tax competition in a simple model with heterogeneous firms: How larger markets reduce profit taxes.’ CESifo Working Paper No. 2867

Haufler, Andreas, and Marco Runkel (2008) ‘Firms’ financial choices and thin capitalization rules under corporate tax competition.’ CESifo Working Paper No. 2429

Helpman, Elhanan, Marc J. Melitz, and Stephen R. Yeaple (2004) ‘Export versus FDI with heterogeneous firms.’ American Economic Review 94(1), 300–316

Hines, James R, Jr, and Eric M Rice (1994) ‘Fiscal paradise: Foreign tax havens and American business.’ The Quarterly Journal of Economics 109(1), 149–82

Homburg, Stefan (2007) ‘Germany’s company tax reform act of 2008.’ Finanzarchiv 63, 591–612

Huizinga, Harry, and Luc Laeven (2008) ‘International profit shifting within multinationals: A multi-country perspective.’ Journal of Public Economics 92, 1164–1182

Krautheim, Sebastian, and Tim Schmidt-Eisenlohr (2011) ‘Heterogeneous firms, ‘profit shifting’ FDI and international tax competition.’ Journal of Public Economics 95(1-2), 122 – 133

Melitz, Marc J. (2003) ‘The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity.’ Econometrica 71, 1695–1725

Overesch, Michael, and Georg Wamser (2010) ‘Corporate tax planning and thincapitalization rules: Evidence from a quasi-experiment.’ Applied Economics 42, 563–573

Weichenrieder, Alfons (2009) ‘Profit shifting in the EU: Evidence from Germany.’ International Tax and Public Finance 16, 281–297

Weichenrieder, Alfons, and Helen Windischbauer (2008) ‘Thin-capitalization rules and company responses. Experience from German legislation.’ CESifo Working Paper No. 2456