
Abstract
This is an investigation of M. Dummett's claim that a theory of meaning based on verification conditions should lead to the abandonment of classical logic in favor of intuitionistic logic. I especially concentrate on his suggestion that, in order to give the meaning of negations and conditionals, we should also take on board falsification conditions. Taken seriously, however, this route takes us not to intuitionistic logic, but rather to one of the Nelson logics.
Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (Speech) |
---|---|
Keywords: | Verificationism, Dummett, Logical Revision, Constructive Logic, Nelson Logic |
Faculties: | Philosophy, Philosophy of Science and Religious Science > XXII. German Congress of Philosophy Philosophy, Philosophy of Science and Religious Science > XXII. German Congress of Philosophy > Logics |
Subjects: | 100 Philosophy and Psychology > 160 Logic |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-12589-8 |
Language: | English |
Item ID: | 12589 |
Date Deposited: | 03. Jan 2012, 11:19 |
Last Modified: | 04. Nov 2020, 12:53 |
References: | [1] M. Dummett. The Seas of Language. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1993. [2] F. Kutschera. Ein verallgemeinerter Widerlegungsbegri? für Gentzenkalküle. Archive for Mathematical Logic, 12(3):104–118, 1969. [3] E. López-Escobar. Constructions and negationless logic. Studia Logica, 30 (1):7–19, 1972. [4] D. Nelson. Constructible falsity. Journal of Symbolic logic, 14/1:16–26, 1949. 5 [5] S. Odintsov. Constructive negations and paraconsistency. Springer Verlag, 2008. [6] H. Wansing. The Logic of Information Structures. Lecture Notes in AI 681. Springer Verlag, 1993. [7] H. Wansing. Displaying Modal Logic. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998. |