Abstract
In a series of three studies, we investigated the validity of implicit theories that the German public holds regarding Muslims. German participants expected Muslims to be more aggressive than Christians, and therefore be more supportive of terrorism than Christians. Furthermore, Muslims were assumed to be more intrinsically religious and to hold a stronger identity with their religion than Christians (Study 1). However, self-asessment surveys of Muslims and Christians in the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS: ex-Soviet Union) revealed that Muslims were not more aggressive, more intrinsically religious, or more supportive of terrorism than Christians. In contrast, Muslims reported a stronger religious identification than Christians(Study 2). Correspondingly, threat to religious identity was found to affect only Muslims’, but not Christians’, attitudes toward terrorism conducted by outgroup perpetrators. In contrast to Germans’ implicit theories regarding Muslims, it was the importance of religious identity and not increased aggression potential that mediated this effect (Study 3).
Dokumententyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
---|---|
Publikationsform: | Publisher's Version |
Keywords: | aggression, Christians, Muslims, religious identifi cation, terrorism |
Fakultät: | Sozialwissenschaften |
Themengebiete: | 100 Philosophie und Psychologie > 150 Psychologie
300 Sozialwissenschaften > 300 Sozialwissenschaft, Soziologie |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-15629-7 |
Allianz-/Nationallizenz: | Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich. |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 15629 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 17. Jun. 2013, 11:43 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 04. Nov. 2020, 12:56 |