Abstract
It is well known that aggregating the degree-of-belief functions of different subjects by linear pooling or averaging is subject to a commutativity dilemma: other than in trivial cases, conditionalizing the individual degree-of-belief functions on a piece of evidence E followed by linearly aggregating them does not yield the same result as rst aggregating them linearly and then conditionalizing the resulting social degree- of-belief function on E. In the present paper we suggest a novel way out of this dilemma: adapting the method of update or learning such that linear pooling com- mutes with it. As it turns out, the resulting update scheme – (general) imaging on the evidence – is well-known from areas such as the study of conditionals and cau- sal decision theory, and a formal result from which the required commutativity property is derivable was supplied already by Gärdenfors (1982) in a different con- text. We end up determining under which conditions imaging would seem to be right method of update, and under which conditions, therefore, group update would not be affected by the commutativity dilemma.
| Item Type: | Journal article |
|---|---|
| EU Funded Grant Agreement Number: | 675415 |
| EU Projects: | Horizon 2020 > Marie Skłodowska Curie Actions > Marie Skłodowska-Curie Innovative Training Networks > 675415: Diaphora: Philosophical Problems, Resilience and Persistent Disagreement |
| Form of publication: | Postprint |
| Faculties: | Philosophy, Philosophy of Science and Religious Science Philosophy, Philosophy of Science and Religious Science > Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy (MCMP) Philosophy, Philosophy of Science and Religious Science > Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy (MCMP) > Diaphora: Logic and Paradox |
| Subjects: | 100 Philosophy and Psychology > 100 Philosophy |
| URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-40481-0 |
| ISSN: | 1750-0117 |
| Language: | English |
| Item ID: | 40481 |
| Date Deposited: | 19. Sep 2017 06:09 |
| Last Modified: | 04. Nov 2020 13:17 |

