Abstract
Translator disclaimer Full Article Figures & data References Citations Metrics Reprints & Permissions Get access Abstract A critical assessment of mass-mediated stereotypes by media users can be deemed as beneficial for an open and humane society. One important concept in this regard is negation, which refers to an internal attempt to negate newly encountered stereotypic media content. This study predicted that disposition-content congruence moderates the negation process. In fact, it investigated whether those whose prejudicial dispositions are congruent with the stereotypic content negate less. An experiment (N = 245) using a quota-based sample was used to test the hypothesis. Participants read stereotypic crime texts including the “criminal foreigner”-stereotype or matched control texts. As hypothesized, unprejudiced readers who held favorable attitudes toward the social minority group negated the stereotypic information. Conversely, highly prejudiced individuals showed even less negation when exposed to the stereotypic versions of the crime texts. Highly prejudiced readers might have viewed exposure to criminal foreigners as a confirmation of their attitudinal predispositions.
Item Type: | Journal article |
---|---|
Keywords: | Disposition-Content Congruency; Media Stereotypes; Negation; Prejudice |
Faculties: | Social Sciences > Communication |
Subjects: | 300 Social sciences > 300 Social sciences, sociology and anthropology 300 Social sciences > 380 Commerce, communications and transportation |
ISSN: | 1746-4099 |
Language: | English |
Item ID: | 42556 |
Date Deposited: | 09. Mar 2018, 12:25 |
Last Modified: | 04. Nov 2020, 13:18 |