Abstract
The article casts doubt on Shimon Gesundheit's theory, published in this journal (VT 62 [2012] 29-57), that in the case of Jer 25,1-14-contrary to mainstream scholarly opinion-the Masoretic text form commands priority over the edition represented by the LXX. Even though Gesundheit's approach is basically sound, his results fail to convince. The conclusions drawn from a diachronic analysis of the passage hold wider implications for the redaction history of the book of Jeremiah, the working philosophies of the ancient tradents of the book, and exegetical method in general.
Dokumententyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
---|---|
Fakultät: | Katholische Theologie |
Themengebiete: | 200 Religion > 200 Religion |
ISSN: | 0042-4935 |
Sprache: | Deutsch |
Dokumenten ID: | 78141 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 15. Dez. 2021, 14:43 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 15. Dez. 2021, 14:43 |