Abstract
Management researchers often develop theories and policies that are forward-looking. The prospective outlook of predictive modeling, where a model predicts unseen or new data, can complement the retrospective nature of causal-explanatory modeling that dominates the field. Partial least squares (PLS) path modeling is an excellent tool for building theories that offer both explanation and prediction. A limitation of PLS, however, is the lack of a statistical test to assess whether a proposed or alternative theoretical model offers significantly better out-of-sample predictive power than a benchmark or an established model. Such an assessment of predictive power is essential for theory development and validation, and for selecting a model on which to base managerial and policy decisions. We introduce the cross-validated predictive ability test (CVPAT) to conduct a pairwise comparison of predictive power of competing models, and substantiate its performance via multiple Monte Carlo studies. We propose a stepwise predictive model comparison procedure to guide researchers, and demonstrate CVPAT's practical utility using the well-known American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) model.
Dokumententyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
---|---|
Keywords: | data, predictive modeling, PLS, partial least squares path modeling, cross-validated predictive ability test, CVPAT, Monte Carlo studies, American Customer Satisfaction Index, ACSI |
Fakultät: | Betriebswirtschaft > Institut für Marketing |
Themengebiete: | 300 Sozialwissenschaften > 330 Wirtschaft |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-95554-6 |
ISSN: | 0011-7315 |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 95554 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 31. Mrz. 2023, 09:18 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 31. Mrz. 2023, 09:18 |