Abstract
This commentary highlights that some of the remaining discrepancies in the attentional-capture debate can be resolved by a simple assumption: observers do not use the priority map when this map is useless to solve the task. Rather, whenever search targets are known to be non-salient, observers resort to a previously postulated alternative search strategy for which (distractor) saliency signals are irrelevant. Equipped with this assumption, we trace thus-far unaccounted-for discrepancies between empirical studies on attentional capture back to specific design choices that affect relative target saliency (display density and non-target heterogeneity).
Dokumententyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
---|---|
Fakultät: | Psychologie und Pädagogik > Department Psychologie |
Themengebiete: | 100 Philosophie und Psychologie > 150 Psychologie |
ISSN: | 1350-6285 |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 100118 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 05. Jun. 2023, 15:33 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 05. Jun. 2023, 15:33 |