Abstract
This commentary highlights that some of the remaining discrepancies in the attentional-capture debate can be resolved by a simple assumption: observers do not use the priority map when this map is useless to solve the task. Rather, whenever search targets are known to be non-salient, observers resort to a previously postulated alternative search strategy for which (distractor) saliency signals are irrelevant. Equipped with this assumption, we trace thus-far unaccounted-for discrepancies between empirical studies on attentional capture back to specific design choices that affect relative target saliency (display density and non-target heterogeneity).
| Item Type: | Journal article |
|---|---|
| Faculties: | Psychology and Education Science > Department Psychology |
| Subjects: | 100 Philosophy and Psychology > 150 Psychology |
| ISSN: | 1350-6285 |
| Language: | English |
| Item ID: | 100118 |
| Date Deposited: | 05. Jun 2023 15:33 |
| Last Modified: | 05. Jun 2023 15:33 |
