Dual-task interference in action programming and action planning - Evidence from the end-state comfort effect

Löhr-Limpens, Miriam; Göhringer, Frederic und Schenk, Thomas (2022): Dual-task interference in action programming and action planning - Evidence from the end-state comfort effect. In: Acta Psychologica, Bd. 228

Abstract

In the present study, we examined the extent of interference between a cognitive task (auditory n-back task) and different aspects of motor performance. Specifically, we wanted to find out whether such interference is more pronounced for aspects of planning as compared to programming. Here, motor planning is represented by a phenomenon called the end-state comfort effect , the fact that we tolerate uncomfortable initial postures in favour of a more comfortable final posture. We asked participants to grasp differently sized cylindrical objects and to place them on target platforms of varying height (grasp-and-place task), So, participants were required to (1) adjust their hand opening to the object width (action programming) and (2) to plan whether to grasp the object higher or lower in order to be able to place it comfortably onto the low or high target platform. We found that participants demonstrated the end-state comfort effect by anticipating the final posture und planning the movement accordingly with a higher object-grasp for low end-target position and lower object-grasp height for high end-target position, respectively. The auditory task was negatively affected by having to perform a visuomotor task in parallel, suggesting that the two tasks share cognitive and attentional resources. No significant impact from the auditory task on the motor tasks was found. Accordingly, it was not possible to determine which of the two motor aspects (programming or planning) contributed more towards the interference observed in the auditory task. To address this question, we carried out a second experiment. For this second experiment we focussed on the interference effects found in the auditory task and contrasted two versions of the grasp-and-place task. In the first version of the task, the height of the target-shelf varied from trial-to-trial but the width of the target object remained the same. We assumed that this version had high planning demands and low programming demands. In the second version the width of the target object varied and the target-shelf height remained constant. Presumably this increased programming demands but reduced planning demands. Significant interference with the auditory task was only found for the first version, supporting the hypothesis that motor planning requires more cognitive resources and thus creates higher multitasking costs.

• Dokumententyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
• Fakultät: Psychologie und Pädagogik > Department Psychologie
• Themengebiete: 100 Philosophie und Psychologie > 150 Psychologie
• ISSN: 0001-6918
• Sprache: Englisch
• DFG: Gefördert durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) - 491502892