Abstract
Bartels (2023; this issue) argues that (a) classic studies and topics covered in psychological textbooks and introductory classes are often misrepresented, (b) that there is an ideological bias among scholars in psychology towards the left side of the political spectrum, and (c) this bias is responsible for the misrepresentation of studies and topics in textbooks. In our commentary, we argue that claims (a) and (b) may be correct, but they have nothing to do with each other. Thus, claim (c) – that a liberal bias among scholars and course instructors leads to “indoctrination” in introductory courses and textbooks – is unsubstantiated and actually detrimental.
Dokumententyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
---|---|
Fakultät: | Psychologie und Pädagogik > Department Psychologie > Sozialpsychologie |
Themengebiete: | 100 Philosophie und Psychologie > 150 Psychologie |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-108247-7 |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 108247 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 29. Nov. 2023, 17:32 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 06. Dez. 2023, 15:19 |
DFG: | Gefördert durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) - 467852570 |