Logo Logo
Hilfe
Hilfe
Switch Language to English

Qiu, Nan ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0562-0298; Zhang, Bei; Allenmark, Fredrik ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3127-4851; Nasemann, Jan; Tsai, Shao‐Yang ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3105-2287; Müller, Hermann J. und Shi, Zhuanghua (2023): Long‐term (statistically learnt) and short‐term (inter‐trial) distractor‐location effects arise at different pre‐ and post‐selective processing stages. In: Psychophysiology, Bd. 60, Nr. 10 [PDF, 7MB]

Abstract

A salient distractor interferes less with visual search if it appears at a location where it is likely to occur, referred to as distractor-location probability cueing. Conversely, if the current target appears at the same location as a distractor on the preceding trial, search is impeded. While these two location-specific “suppression” effects reflect long-term, statistically learnt and short-term, inter-trial adaptations of the system to distractors, it is unclear at what stage(s) of processing they arise. Here, we adopted the additional-singleton paradigm and examined lateralized event-related potentials (L-ERPs) and lateralized alpha (8–12 Hz) power to track the temporal dynamics of these effects. Behaviorally, we confirmed both effects: reaction times (RTs) interference was reduced for distractors at frequent versus rare (distractor) locations, and RTs were delayed for targets that appeared at previous distractor versus non-distractor locations. Electrophysiologically, the statistical-learning effect was not associated with lateralized alpha power during the pre-stimulus period. Rather, it was seen in an early N1pc referenced to the frequent distractor location (whether or not a distractor or a target occurred there), indicative of a learnt top-down prioritization of this location. This early top-down influence was systematically modulated by (competing) target- and distractor-generated bottom-up saliency signals in the display. In contrast, the inter-trial effect was reflected in an enhanced SPCN when the target was preceded by a distractor at its location. This suggests that establishing that an attentionally selected item is a task-relevant target, rather than an irrelevant distractor, is more demanding at a previously “rejected” distractor location.

Dokument bearbeiten Dokument bearbeiten