Abstract
In order to investigate the effects of the hypnotic state a standardized hypnosis session was conducted with 144 subjects in a controlled laboratory study. The induction of a hypnotic trance in the German version of the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility (HGSHS:A by Shor and Orne, 1962) was tape-recorded and used as the treatment. The HGSHS:A seems to be a reliable measure of suggestibility and hypnotizability. This is underlined by the consistent results of a factor analysis on the depths of hypnosis that is in agreement with former studies. Descriptive data analyses with a sufficient number of subjects of high and low suggestibility suggest that our hypnosis induction by tape is an effective method of producing a hypnotic trance. Analyses of within-subjects variables did not reveal any valid predictors of hypnotizability, thereby confirming the need of screening instruments such as the HGSHS.
Dokumententyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
---|---|
Keywords: | factor structure, hypnosis, suggestibility scales, HGSHS |
Fakultät: | Psychologie und Pädagogik > Department Psychologie > Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie |
Themengebiete: | 100 Philosophie und Psychologie > 150 Psychologie |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-11020-0 |
ISSN: | 0960-5290 |
Dokumenten ID: | 11020 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 29. Okt. 2009, 13:22 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 04. Nov. 2020, 12:52 |
Literaturliste: | Ås A, Lauer LW (1962) A factor-analytic study of hypnotizability and related personal experiences. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 10: 169–82. Balthazard CG (1993) The hypnosis scales at their centenary: some fundamental issues still unresolved. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 41: 47–73. Balthazard CG, Woody EZ (1992) The spectral analysis of hypnotic performance with respect to ‘absorption’. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 40: 21–43. Bernheim H (1888) Die Suggestion und ihre Heilwirkung (Übers. von Sigmund Freud). Tübingen: Edition Diskord. (Fotomechanischer Nachdruck der Ausgabe Leipzig und Wien, 1985). Bernheim H (1917) Automatisme et Suggestion. Paris: Alcan. Bongartz W (1982) Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility Form A. Unpublished translation into German, University of Konstanz. Braffman W, Kirsch I (1999) Imaginative suggestibility and hypnotizability: an empirical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77: 578–87. Braid J (1843) Neurypnology: Or, the Rational of Nervous Sleep, Considered in Relation with Animal Magnetism. London, Edinburgh: Churchill & Black. Das JP (1958) Factor analysis of a hypnotic scale. Indian Journal of Psychology 33: 97–100. Evans FJ (1965) The structure of hypnosis: a factor analytic investigation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Sydney. Eysenck HJ (1989) Personality, primary and secondary suggestibility, and hypnosis. In: VA Gheorghiu, P Netter, HJ Eysenck, R Rosenthal (eds) Suggestion and Suggestibility: Theory and Research. Berlin: Springer, 57–68. Eysenck HJ, Furneaux WD (1945) Primary and secondary suggestibility: an experimental and statistical study. Journal of Experimental Psychology 35: 485–503. Faria JC (1819) De la Cause du Sommeil Lucide: Ou‚ Etude sur la Nature de l’Homme (ed. DG Dalgado, 2nd edition, 1906). Paris: Henri Jouve. Hammer AG, Evans FJ, Bartlett M (1963) Factors in hypnosis and suggestion. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology 67: 15–23. Hilgard ER (1965) Hypnotic Susceptibility. New York: Harcourt. Hilgard ER (1967) Individual differences in hypnotizability. In: JE Gordon (ed) Handbook of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis. New York: Macmillan, 391–43. Hilgard ER (1981) Hypnotic susceptibility scales under attack: an examination of Weitzenhoffer’s criticisms. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 29: 24–41. Jean RS, MacLeod C (1983) Hypnosis, absorption, and time perception. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 92: 81–6. Kirsch I (1997) Suggestibility or hypnosis: what do our scales really measure? International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 45: 212–25. Krause C (2001) Hypnotisierbarkeit, Suggestibilität und Trancetiefe. In: D Revenstorf, B Peter (Hrsg) Hypnose in Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik und Medizin. Ein Manual für die Praxis. Heidelberg: Springer, S.101–19. Laux L, Glanzmann P, Schaffner, Spielberger CD (1981) Das State – Trait – Angstinventar, Theoretische Grundlagen und Handanweisung. Weinheim: Beltz. Moore RK (1964) Susceptibility to hypnosis and susceptibility to social influence. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology 68: 282–94. Pekala RJ, Forbes EJ (1997) Types of hypnotically (un)susceptible individuals as a function of phenomenological experience: towards a typology of hypnotic types. American Journal of Clinical-Hypnosis 39(3): 212–24. Pekala RJ, Wenger CF, Levine RL (1985) Individual differences in phenomenological experience: states of consciousness as a function of absorption. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48: 125–32. Perry C, Nadon R, Button J (1992) The measurement of hypnotic ability. In: E Fromm, MR Nash (eds) Contemporary Hypnosis Research, New York: Guilford, 459–90. Peter B (2001) Hypnose und die Konstruktion von Wirklichkeit. In: D Revenstorf, B Peter (Hrsg) Hypnose in Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik und Medizin. Ein Manual für die Praxis. Heidelberg: Springer, S. 33–53. Peters JP, Dhanens TP, Lundy RM, Landy FJ (1974) A factor analytic investigation of the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 22: 377–85. Plotnick AW, Paine PA, O’Grady DJ (1991) Correlates of hypnotizability in children: absorption, vividness of imagery, phantasy play, and social desirability. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis 34 (1): 1–58. Shor RE, Orne EC (1962) Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. (Deutsche Fassung von W. Bongartz, Universität Konstanz, 1982). Shor RE, Orne EC (1963) Norms on the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 11: 39–48. Spanos NP, Flynn DM, Gwynn MI (1989) Kontext-Anforderungen, negative Halluzinationen und die Geheime-Beobachter-Reaktion: Drei Geheime Beobachter beobachtet. Hypnose und Kognition 6: 33–40. Spanos NP, Mah CD, Pawlak AE, D′Eon JL, Ritchie G (1980) A multivariate and factor analytic study of hypnotic susceptibility. Unpublished Manuscript, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Stukat KG (1958) Suggestibility: A Factorial and Experimental Analysis. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell. Tellegen A (1978–79) On measures and conceptions of hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis 21(2&3): 219–36. Tellegen A, Atkinson G (1974) Openess to absorbing and self-altering experiences (‘absorption’), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 83: 268–77. Weitzenhoffer AM (1980) Hypnotic susceptibility revisited. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis 22: 130–46. Weitzenhoffer AM (1993) Suggestibilität und Hypnose im zwanzigsten Jahrhundert. Hypnose und Kognition 10: 78–86. Weitzenhoffer AH, Hilgard ER (1959) Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Forms A and B. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. (Deutsche Fassung von Walter Bongartz, University of Konstanz, 1982). Woody EZ (1997) Have the hypnotic susceptibility scales outlived their usefulness? International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 45: 301–13. Woody EZ, Bowers KS, Oakman JM (1992) A conceptual analysis of hypnotic responsiveness: experience, individual differences, and context. In: E Fromm, MR Nash (eds) Contemporary Hypnosis Research. New York: Guilford, 3–33. |