Abstract
Objectives. We identify core product quality components from the consumers’ perspective and construct a psychometrically sound instrument for their assessment within different purchasing contexts. Methods. Study 1 (N = 34) used a qualitative approach to reveal core components of perceived product quality in the context of apparel evaluations. Study 2 (N = 305) was designed to construct and quantitatively validate the quality scale in a retail store setting. In Study 3 (N = 180) using a second purchasing context the scale’s dimensionality was cross-validated in a mail-order context. Results. Six components of product quality emerged (material, workmanship, design, care, color, fit) and explained approximately 75% of the variance in consumers’ product evaluations. Their dimensional structure was validated using confirmatory factor analysis. Differences concerning the quality dimensions’ relative importance were found for the two purchasing situations. Conclusion. The quality scale proved to be reliable and valid in two important purchasing contexts.
Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (Poster) |
---|---|
Keywords: | quality, product quality, quality scale, quality dimensions, product evaluation, consumer behavior, marketing, Qualität, Produktqualität, Qualitätsskala, Qualitätsdimensionen, Produktevaluation, Konsumentenverhalten, |
Faculties: | Psychology and Education Science > Department Psychology > General Psychology II > Conference proceedings |
Subjects: | 100 Philosophy and Psychology > 150 Psychology |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-11530-2 |
Language: | English |
Item ID: | 11530 |
Date Deposited: | 16. Jun 2010, 07:47 |
Last Modified: | 04. Nov 2020, 12:52 |
References: | Eckman, M., Damhorst, M. L., & Kadolph, S. J. (1990). Toward a model of the in-store purchase decision process: Consumer use of criteria for evaluating women’s apparel. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 8, 13-22. Forsythe, S., Presley, A. B., & Caton, K. W. (1996). Dimensions of apparel quality influencing consumers’ perceptions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 83, 299–305. Garvin, D. A. (1984). What does “product quality“ really mean? Sloan Management Review, 26, 25-43. Hu, L.-T. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. Menon, A. & Chowdhury, J. (1995). Dimensions of quality: Considerations in the context of consumer goods. Journal of Marketing Management, 5, 1-15. Spörrle, M., Quenzer, M., Ziebula, R., & Brändli, D. (2007). Wahrgenommene Qualität im Kontext von modischen Aspekten, Preisleistung und Service als Determinante des Kundenurteils im Textilversandhandel: Empirische Befunde zur Entwicklung eines integrativen Skalensystems. [Abstract]. In C. H. Antoni, C. Bauer-Emmel & A. Fischbach (Hrsg.), Psychologie im Arbeitsleben: Wissenschaftlich denken – praktisch handeln. Abstracts und Programm der 5. Tagung der Fachgruppe Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie in der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie (S. 178) . Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers. |