ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2712-0788; Kühn, Simone
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6823-7969 und Wittekind, Charlotte E.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5841-0067
(Februar 2025):
Deficits in general and smoking‐specific response inhibition in the Go/No‐Go task in individuals who smoke: A cross‐sectional analysis.
In: Addiction [Forthcoming]
Abstract
Background and aims: Previous studies on response inhibition deficits in smoking have often been conducted in small, young, age-homogeneous samples, without controlling for covariates or testing moderating effects. The primary research question compared response inhibition between a large, age-diverse smoking sample and non-smoking controls, and examined whether deficits were exacerbated toward smoking-related stimuli. By accounting for key covariates and moderators, this study aimed to extend understanding of individual differences in response inhibition deficits in smoking.
Design and setting: Cross-sectional study conducted at a university laboratory in Munich, Germany.
Participants: The large (n = 122, 57% female), age-diverse (Mage = 41.4, range: 21–70 years) smoking group comprised individuals with moderate to severe tobacco dependence participating in a smoking reduction intervention study. Controls comprised n = 69 healthy individuals with no smoking history.
Measurements: Primary outcomes were commission error (CE) rates and mean reaction times in Go trials (Go-RT) in general and smoking-specific Go/No-Go tasks (GNGTs). Covariates included age, sex and IQ. Smoking-related variables were cigarettes per day (CPD), tobacco dependence severity and craving.
Findings: General GNGT: The smoking group exhibited significantly higher CE rates (P-value < 0.001, medium effect, BF10 = 9.06) than the control group. Higher craving was associated with faster Go-RTs (β = −1.487, P-value = 0.041). Smoking-specific GNGT: CE rates were significantly higher in the smoking group only when controlling for covariates (β = 1.272, P-value = 0.040). Higher craving was associated with higher CE rates during smoking-related trials (β = 0.108, P-value = 0.010). The smoking group showed significantly faster Go-RTs in response to smoking-related compared with neutral stimuli, relative to the control group (β = −3.326, P-value = 0.027). Preliminary evidence indicated that greater deficits were associated with higher scores in smoking-related variables, but only in older individuals.
Conclusions: Individuals who smoke appear to exhibit response inhibition deficits, although these are not uniform and seem to be exacerbated during higher reported craving or in response to smoking-related stimuli. Age may moderate the relationship between deficits and smoking-related variables.
Dokumententyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
---|---|
EU Funded Grant Agreement Number: | 677804; 101086188 |
EU-Projekte: | Horizon 2020 > ERC Grants |
Fakultät: | Psychologie und Pädagogik > Department Psychologie > Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie |
Themengebiete: | 100 Philosophie und Psychologie > 150 Psychologie |
ISSN: | 0965-2140 |
Bemerkung: | Early View |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 126258 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 26. Mai 2025 16:54 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 26. Mai 2025 16:54 |