Abstract
Providing feedback on peer solutions to geometry proofs can support preservice mathematics teachers' assessment skills of such complex tasks. However, the quality of peer solutions may influence cognitive processing during peer-feedback provision, learning from providing peer-feedback, and peer-feedback content. To investigate this effect, we recorded the eye-movements of fifty-three preservice mathematics teachers while providing feedback on a near-correct or an erroneous peer solution to a geometry proof, and we measured their proof comprehension and peer-feedback content. Results show that the absence of errors earlier in the peer solution facilitated reliance on a figure-based approach, whereas encountering errors earlier in the peer solution was associated with more focus on the text of the proof. Students who provided peer-feedback on the near correct peer solution had better comprehension of the proof, and they provided more accurate peer-feedback. Errors in peer solutions thus appear to hinder positive peer-feedback outcomes.
Item Type: | Journal article |
---|---|
Faculties: | Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics > Mathematics Psychology and Education Science > Department Psychology |
Subjects: | 500 Science > 510 Mathematics 100 Philosophy and Psychology > 150 Psychology |
ISSN: | 0959-4752 |
Language: | English |
Item ID: | 66351 |
Date Deposited: | 19. Jul 2019, 12:19 |
Last Modified: | 13. Aug 2024, 12:42 |