Abstract
Peer feedback is widely used to train assessment skills and to support collaborative learning of various learning tasks, but research on peer feedback in the domain of mathematics is limited. Although domain knowledge seems to be a prerequisite for peer-feedback provision, it only recently received attention in the peer-feedback literature. In this study, preservice mathematics teachers (N = 43) were involved in a peer-feedback training in which they evaluated geometric construction tasks and were (a) trained to provide peer feedback on different levels (i.e. task, process and self-regulation) and (b) scaffolded with worked examples, feedback provision prompts and evaluation rubrics during the training. A quasi-experimental mixed design was implemented with domain knowledge as the between-subject factor and measurement occasion as the within-subject factor. Students' peer-feedback provision skills and their beliefs about peer-feedback provision were measured before and after the training. Students with high and medium domain knowledge provided more peer feedback at the self-regulation level, whereas those low in domain knowledge provided more peer feedback at the task-level after the training. Students' beliefs about peer-feedback provision became less positive after the training, regardless of the level of their domain knowledge.
Item Type: | Journal article |
---|---|
Faculties: | Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics > Mathematics Psychology and Education Science > Department Psychology |
Subjects: | 500 Science > 510 Mathematics 100 Philosophy and Psychology > 150 Psychology |
ISSN: | 0256-2928 |
Language: | English |
Item ID: | 66352 |
Date Deposited: | 19. Jul 2019, 12:19 |
Last Modified: | 13. Aug 2024, 12:42 |