Abstract
Three studies explored whether cognitive dissonance in smokers is reduced immediately or remains constant due to the perceived health risk. Because dissonance-reducing strategies might occur very quickly and previous research has focused only on ratings concerning health risk, we additionally analyzed response latencies and psychophysiological arousal as more implicit measurements. In Study 1, 2, and 3, participants rated their smoking-related health risks twice for different diseases. Ratings, response latencies (Study 1, 2), and psychophysiological arousal (Study 3) differed during the first testing. Differences in response latencies and psychophysiological arousal diminished during the second testing, whereas ratings did not change. The results are discussed in terms of implicit methods as measurements for cognitive dissonance and in terms of prevention and intervention programs.
Item Type: | Journal article |
---|---|
Keywords: | arousal;cognitive dissonance;ratings;response latencies;smoking |
Faculties: | Social Sciences > Communication |
Subjects: | 100 Philosophy and Psychology > 150 Psychology 300 Social sciences > 300 Social sciences, sociology and anthropology |
ISSN: | 1864-9335 |
Language: | English |
Item ID: | 68764 |
Date Deposited: | 30. Aug 2019, 07:20 |
Last Modified: | 04. Nov 2020, 13:51 |