Abstract
Although employees suffer from negative effects of value incongruence, the way employees deal with it has rarely been explored. Combining person-environment research and conservation of resources theory, we predicted that the relationship between value incongruence and work-related outcomes would be moderated by three individual coping strategies: facades of conformity, positive reframing, and self-disclosure. We conducted one multilevel team study with 50 teams (N = 145) and one time-lagged study with two measurement occasions (N = 177). As expected, findings of our (multilevel) path models showed that person-group (PG) and person-organization (PO) value incongruence negatively related to the outcomes;however, our results suggest that the effects of PO value incongruence were stronger (Study 2). As hypothesized, self-disclosure and low facades of conformity mitigated the effect of PO value incongruence on absenteeism (Study 2). Additionally, self-disclosure buffered the effect of PG value incongruence on affective commitment (Study 1).
Item Type: | Journal article |
---|---|
Faculties: | Munich School of Management Psychology and Education Science > Department Psychology |
Subjects: | 300 Social sciences > 330 Economics 100 Philosophy and Psychology > 150 Psychology |
ISSN: | 1359-432X |
Language: | English |
Item ID: | 78165 |
Date Deposited: | 15. Dec 2021, 14:43 |
Last Modified: | 15. Dec 2021, 14:43 |