ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4347-5028; Riehle, Anna 
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1596-4256; Jannott, Hannah 
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4728-6310; Vornhagen, Joëlle‐Sophie 
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7575-2134; Stoll, Johannes 
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0447-7373; Markhoff, Lea 
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2125-4292 und Terzi, Pia von 
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7320-2135
  
(2025):
		Psychological needs related to civil inattention: A qualitative and quantitative view on public encounters.
	
	 In: British Journal of Social Psychology, Bd. 64, Nr.  1, e12828
      
        
          
             [PDF, 2MB]
          
        
      
 
			  
			  
               
              
  
              Abstract
As described by early sociological research (Goffman, 1963, Behavior in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings), a typical behavioural pattern in public encounters between strangers is so-called Civil Inattention (CI). CI describes a ritual of politely communicating having noticed the other while assuring non-communication intentions. A typical example of showing CI is initially looking at the other person but then quickly averting the gaze. As argued earlier, CI fulfils a central role in the smooth functioning of a society. Also, CI gains new relevance in the digital era, in particular regarding privacy needs. Still, previous research on CI often remained on a theoretical or descriptive level, and its psychological functions have not been explored systematically. As an advancement, our study provides a deeper understanding of CI, exploring individual narratives, relevant psychological needs, and contextual factors. We conducted a qualitative interview study (N = 25) followed by an experimental online study (N = 353) with a 2 (presence of CI) × 2 (physical distance) mixed design. It shows that CI adds to well-being and specifically addresses needs for relatedness, security, and autonomy. However, though Study 1 suggested physical distance as a relevant contextual factor, the present experimental manipulation in Study 2 did not show significant effects.
| Dokumententyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel | 
|---|---|
| Fakultät: | Psychologie und Pädagogik > Department Psychologie > Wirtschafts- und Organisationspsychologie | 
| Themengebiete: | 100 Philosophie und Psychologie > 150 Psychologie | 
| URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-125757-4 | 
| ISSN: | 0144-6665 | 
| Sprache: | Englisch | 
| Dokumenten ID: | 125757 | 
| Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 28. Apr. 2025 12:34 | 
| Letzte Änderungen: | 28. Apr. 2025 12:34 | 
| DFG: | Gefördert durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) - 402731241 | 
 
		 
	 
    


