Abstract
Factorial validity is often assessed using confirmatory factor analysis. Model fit is commonly evaluated using the cutoff values for the fit indices proposed by Hu and Bentler (1999). There is a body of research showing that those cutoff values cannot be generalized. Model fit does not only depend on the severity of misspecification, but also on nuisance parameters, which are independent of the misspecification. Using a simulation study, we demonstrate their influence on measures of model fit. We specified a severe misspecification, omitting a second factor, which signifies factorial invalidity. Measures of model fit showed only small misfit because nuisance parameters, magnitude of factor loadings and a balanced/imbalanced number of indicators per factor, also influenced the degree of misfit. Drawing from our results, we discuss challenges in the assessment of factorial validity.
| Item Type: | Journal article |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | confirmatory factor analysis (CFA); model fit; misspecification; factor loadings; factorial validity |
| Faculties: | Psychology and Education Science > Department Psychology > Psychological Methodology and Diagnostic |
| Subjects: | 100 Philosophy and Psychology > 150 Psychology |
| ISSN: | 1614-2241 |
| Language: | English |
| Item ID: | 60772 |
| Date Deposited: | 28. Feb 2019 14:00 |
| Last Modified: | 04. Nov 2020 13:39 |
