Abstract
This study investigates scientific reasoning abilities in 3- to 6-year-old children (N = 67) focusing on their understanding of the relation between causal hypotheses and evidence. Children's evidence generation behaviors and their evidence-based verbal arguments against false causal claims were examined in a blicket detector paradigm. Children were first led to generate and then to test a specific hypothesis about the cause of a light effect. Subsequently, children were presented with two false causal claims in order to elicit evidence-based verbal counterarguments and evidence generation behaviors. The large majority of the children (82%) adopted a systematic hypothesis testing strategy (positive or contrastive testing). Furthermore, 70% of the children provided disconfirming verbal counterarguments and/or selectively generated disconfirming evidence in response to a false claim at least once. In sum, the present study yielded new evidence for scientific reasoning abilities in early childhood.
Item Type: | Journal article |
---|---|
Form of publication: | Publisher's Version |
Faculties: | Psychology and Education Science > Department Psychology > Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie II |
Subjects: | 100 Philosophy and Psychology > 150 Psychology |
ISSN: | 0885-2014 |
Language: | English |
Item ID: | 66109 |
Date Deposited: | 19. Jul 2019, 12:19 |
Last Modified: | 26. Jan 2022, 17:54 |