Abstract
After introducing the theoretical frame of the study given through Lakoff and Johnson’s Conceptual Metaphor Theory, the goals and ideas behind the undertaking of this question will be explained in more details. A consequent chapter of the paper is dedicated to methodology and proceedings. Great importance and care is given to this chapter, as the study isn’t completely embedded in any traditional school of linguistics, with standard procedures, but rather an experimental work combining more than one research approaches. The results of the study will be presented in two sections. They will first be presented in a relatively traditional view of conceptual metaphor, and then evaluated from discourse analysis, feminist linguistics and socio-historical perspectives. Finally, we want to remind the reader that language is one of the main specificities of human beings, and thus linguistics should be centred in the general human sciences. For this reason, and because of the theme of our research question, we chose to conclude the process with a Gender Study approach.
Dokumententyp: | LMU München: Studienabschlussarbeit |
---|---|
Keywords: | Conceptual Metaphor Theorie; Lakoff Kövesces; Gender; Song text; mainstream music; pop culture; sex; love; women; sociohistorical; 68; sexual revolution; critical discourse analysis; Gender studie, Songtext; Frau; Mann; Sexismus; Metaphern |
Fakultät: | Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaften > Department 2 > Allgemeine und Typologische Sprachwissenschaft |
Institut oder Departement: | Departement II |
Themengebiete: | 300 Sozialwissenschaften > 390 Bräuche, Etikette, Folklore
400 Sprache > 410 Linguistik 800 Literatur > 890 Andere Literaturen |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-70204-8 |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 70204 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 22. Jan. 2020, 12:48 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 05. Nov. 2020, 17:25 |
Literaturliste: | Kövecses, Z. (1986). Metaphors of anger, pride, and love. Amsterdam u.a.: Benjamins. Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor. Oxford [u.a.]: Oxford Univ. Press. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Conceptual Metaphor in Every Day Language. In (Vol. Journal of Philosophy, pp. 453 - 486). Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, Ill. [u.a.]: Univ. of Chicago Press. PRAGGLEJAZ, g. (2007). MIP: A Method for Identifying Metaphorically Used Words in Discours. In (Vol. Metaphor and Symbol, pp. 1 - 39): Lawrence Erlbraum Associates, Inc |