Abstract
Educational technology is increasingly used in multicultural contexts and across national cultures. Educational technology users with different national and professional backgrounds may, however, exhibit different attitudes towards technology. Previous research provides isolated evidence of the relationship between learning technology acceptance and culture, and so an overall picture is missing. Therefore, this study attempts to integrate culture (sensu Hofstede, 2001) into an established technology acceptance model (ie. the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology, UTAUT, Venkatesh, Morris, Davis & Davis, 2003). Examining a large sample (N = 2866) of learning technology users from Germany and Romania by means of questionnaire survey, we investigate the differences in culture and technology acceptance between sample subgroups. The collected data reveal the presence of cultural differences both between countries and between professions. In line with previous research, these differences are associated with dissimilar acceptance profiles, ie. different values of acceptance variables and of path coefficients between them. Based on the findings, this study makes headway in cross-cultural research by proposing an extended model of UTAUT – one which integrates three of Hofstede’s culture dimensions. As a practical implication, national and professional culture may shape computer-based learning environments.
Dokumententyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
---|---|
Keywords: | Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology; Technology Acceptance, Cultural Values; Cross-Cultural Study |
Fakultät: | Psychologie und Pädagogik > Department Psychologie > Empirische Pädagogik und Pädagogische Psychologie |
Themengebiete: | 100 Philosophie und Psychologie > 150 Psychologie
300 Sozialwissenschaften > 370 Bildung und Erziehung |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-14693-7 |
ISSN: | 1467-8535 |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 14693 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 01. Mrz. 2013 13:16 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 04. Nov. 2020 12:55 |
Literaturliste: | Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (2000). Attitudes and the attitude-behaviour relation: Reasoned and automatic processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 11, 1-33. Beaudry, A. & Pinsonneault, A. (2010). The other side of acceptance: Studying the direct and indirect effects of emotions on information technology use. MIS Quarterly, 34 (4), 689-710. Cronjé, J. C. (2011). Using Hofstede’s cultural dimensions to interpret cross-cultural blended teaching and learning. Computers & Education, 56, 596-603. Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Hofstede, G. (2012). VSM 94. Retrieved online 04/13/2012 at: http://www.geerthofstede.nl /vsm-94 Hofstede, G. & McCrae, R. R. (2004). Personality and culture revisited: Linking traits and dimensions of culture. Cross-Cultural Research, 38 (1), 52-88. Hu, L. & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6 (1), 1-55. Im, I., Kim, Y. & Han, H. J. (2008). The effects of perceived risk and technology type on users’ acceptance of technologies. Information & Management, 45, 1-9. Keller, C., Lindh, J., Hrastinski, S., Casanovas, I. & Fernandez, G. (2009). The impact of national culture on e-learning implementation: a comparative study of an Argentinean and a Swedish university. Educational Media International, 46 (1), 67-80. Leidner, D. E. & Kayworth, T. (2006). A review of culture in information systems research: Toward a theory of information technology culture conflict. MIS Quarterly, 30 (2), 357-399. Li, D., Chau, P. Y. K. & Van Slyke, C. (2010). A comparative study of individual acceptance of instant messaging in the US and China: A structural equation modeling approach. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 26 (5), 85-106. Luca, A. (2005). Studiu despre valorile ?i comportamentul românesc din perspectiva dimensiunilor culturale dupa metoda lui Geert Hofstede [A study of Romanian values and behavior from the perspective of Geert Hofstede’s cultural dimensions]. Bucharest: Interact. Retrieved online 04/13/2012 at: http://www.training.ro/ docs/studiu2.pdf Nistor, N., Dehne, A. & Drews, F. T. (2010). Mass customization of teaching and training in organizations. Design principles and prototype evaluation. Studies in Continuing Education, 32 (3), 251-267. Nistor, N., Wagner, M., Istvánffy, E. & Dragota, M. (2010). The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: Verifying the model from a European perspective. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 6 (2-3), 185-199. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y. & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method bias in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (5), 879-903. Pynoo, B., Tondeur, J., Braak, J., Duyck, W., Sijnave, B. & Duyck, P. (2012). Teachers’ acceptance and use of an educational portal. Computers & Education, 58, 1308-1307. Sarker, S. & Valacich, J. S. (2010). An alternative to methodological individualism: A non-reductionist approach to studying technology adoption by groups. MIS Quarterly, 34 (4), 779-808. Teo, T., Luan, W. S., & Sing, C. C. (2008). A cross-cultural examination of the intention to use technology between Singaporean and Malaysian pre-service teachers: an application of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Educational Technology & Society, 11 (4), 265-280. Triandis, , H. C. (1972). The analysis of subjective culture. New York: John Wiley. Veltri, N. & Elgarah, W. (2009). The role of national culture in social networking adoption. In C. F. Rogers & Y. C. Chen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the Southern Association for Information Systems (pp. 169-174). Statesboro, GA: Georgia Southern University. Retrieved online 04/13/2012 at: http://ut.academia.edu/NatashaVeltri/ Papers/1269313/The_role_of_national_cultural_differences_in_user_adoption_of_social_networking Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B. & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425-478. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L. & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. MIS Quarterly, 36 (1), 157-178. Venkatesh, V. & Zhang, X. (2010). The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: U.S. vs. China. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 13 (1), 5-27. Zakour, A. B. (2007). Information technology acceptance across cultures. In W. K. Law (Ed.), Information resources management: global challenges (pp. 25-53). Hershey, PA: Idea. |