Abstract
We hypothesized that students use the message behind teacher emotions to interpret the cause of their failure and to form competence beliefs; hence, in failure situations teacher anger could be beneficial. In Experiment 1, participants made judgments about another student’s failure in the face of teacher pity versus anger. Lack of ability attributions were made and low competence was perceived, when pity was interpreted as the teacher attributed the failure to lack of ability. Lack of effort attributions were made when anger was interpreted as the teacher attributed the failure to lack of effort. Experiment 2 replicated and extended these findings by examining students responses to their own failure. Findings imply that expressing anger is less detrimental than many teachers suppose
Dokumententyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
---|---|
Fakultät: | Psychologie und Pädagogik > Department Psychologie > Psychology in the Learning Sciences |
Themengebiete: | 100 Philosophie und Psychologie > 150 Psychologie
300 Sozialwissenschaften > 370 Bildung und Erziehung |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 61902 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 17. Mai 2019, 10:33 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 04. Nov. 2020, 13:39 |