![[höher]](/style/images/multi_up.png)
Eine Ebene höher- Fakultäten (101898)
- Philosophie, Wissenschaftstheorie und Religionswissenschaft (1817)
- Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy (MCMP) (693)
- Epistemology (87)
- Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy (MCMP) (693)
- Philosophie, Wissenschaftstheorie und Religionswissenschaft (1817)
Anzahl der Publikationen auf dieser Ebene: 83
Deutsch
Ciardelli, Ivano und Roelofsen, Floris
(2009):
Generalized inquisitive logic: Completeness via intuitionistic Kripke models.
12th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, Stanford, USA, 6. - 8. Juli 2009.
S. 71-80
Hartmann, Stephan und Bovens, Luc
(2006):
Bayesianische Erkenntnistheorie.
Paderborn: Mentis Verlag.
Pigozzi, Gabriella und Hartmann, Stephan
(2006):
Merging Judgments and the Problem of Truth-Tracking.
1st International Workshop on Computational Social Choice, ILLC, University of Amsterdam, 6-8 December.
Endriss, Ulle und Lang, Jérôme (Hrsg.):
In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Computational Social Choice (COMSOC-2006),
S. 408-421
Poellinger, Roland
(2014):
Wer da? – Turings Test in virtuellen Spielwelten.
In: Demmler, Kathrin; Lutz, Klaus und Ring, Sebastian (Hrsg.):
Computerspiele und Medienpädagogik. Materialien zur Medienpädagogik, Bd. 11. München: kopaed Verlag.
Englisch
Gähde, Ulrich und Hartmann, Stephan (Hrsg.)
(2005):
Coherence, Truth and Testimony.
Bd. 63. : Springer Netherlands.
Gähde, Ulrich und Hartmann, Stephan (Hrsg.)
(2006):
Coherence, Truth and Testimony.
Berlin: Springer.
Haenni, Rolf und Hartmann, Stephan (Hrsg.)
(2006):
Causality, Uncertainty and Ignorance.
Minds and Machines, Bd. 16. : Springer.
Hartmann, Stephan und Bovens, Luc (Hrsg.)
(Juni 2007):
Bayesian Epistemology.
Synthese, Bd. 156. 3. : Springer.
Hartmann, Stephan; Lisciandra, Chiara und Machery, Edouard (Hrsg.)
(2013):
Formal Epistemology Meets Experimental Philosophy.
Synthese, Bd. 190. 8. : Springer Netherlands.
Hartmann, Stephan; Martini, Carlo und Sprenger, Jan (Hrsg.)
(2010):
Formal Modeling in Social Epistemology.
Logic Journal of the IGPL, Bd. 18.
Abasnezhad, Ali und Jenkins, C. S.
(2018):
Metaphysical Vagueness Without Vague Objects.
In: Thought-A Journal of Philosophy, Bd. 7, Nr. 4: S. 278-283
Bovens, Luc; Fitelson, Branden; Hartmann, Stephan und Snyder, Josh
(2002):
Too Odd (Not) to Be True? A Reply to Olsson.
In: The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Bd. 53, Nr. 4: S. 539-563
Bovens, Luc und Hartmann, Stephan
(2006):
An Impossibility Result for Coherence Rankings.
In: Philosophical Studies, Bd. 128, Nr. 1: S. 77-91
Bovens, Luc und Hartmann, Stephan
(8. Januar 2004):
Bayesian Epistemology.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bovens, Luc und Hartmann, Stephan
(2005):
Coherence and the Role of Specificity: A Response to Meijs and Douven.
In: Mind, Bd. 114, Nr. 454: S. 365-369
Bovens, Luc und Hartmann, Stephan
(2003):
Solving the Riddle of Coherence.
In: Mind, Bd. 112, Nr. 448: S. 601-633
Bovens, Luc und Hartmann, Stephan
(2005):
Why There Cannot be a Single Probabilistic Measure of Coherence.
In: Erkenntnis, Bd. 63, Nr. 3: S. 361-374
Bovens, Luc und Hartmann, Stephan
(2000):
Coherence, Belief Expansion and Bayesian Networks.
In: Baral, C. und Truszczynski, M. (Hrsg.):
Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning.
Bradley, Seamus und Steele, Katie
(28. September 2013):
Uncertainty, Learning and the ‘Problem’ of Dilation.
In: Erkenntnis: S. 1-17
Casini, Lorenzo 
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9891-7324 und Landes, Jürgen ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3105-6624
(2022):
Confirmation by Robustness Analysis: A Bayesian Account.
In: Erkenntnis
[PDF, 1MB]
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9891-7324 und Landes, Jürgen ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3105-6624
(2022):
Confirmation by Robustness Analysis: A Bayesian Account.
In: Erkenntnis
[PDF, 1MB]
Colombo, Matteo; Elkin, Lee und Hartmann, Stephan
(15. Dezember 2016):
Bayesian Cognitive Science, Monopoly, and Neglected Frameworks.
[PDF, 269kB]
Darby, George und Landes, Jürgen
(2014):
There Is More to a Paradox Than Credence.
In: Thought: A Journal of Philosophy, Bd. 3, Nr. 2: S. 99-109
Dardashti, Radin; Hartmann, Stephan; Thébault, Karim P. Y. und Winsberg, Eric
(27. Dezember 2015):
Hawking Radiation and Analogue Experiments: A Bayesian Analysis.
[PDF, 254kB]
Dawid, Richard und Hartmann, Stephan
(6. April 2017):
The No Miracles Argument without the Base Rate Fallacy.
In: Synthese
[PDF, 306kB]
De Pretis, Francesco; Peden, William J.; Landes, Jürgen ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3105-6624 und Osimani, Barbara
(2022):
Pharmacovigilance as Personalized Evidence.
In: Bertolaso, Marta und Canali, Stefano (Hrsg.):
Personalized Medicine in the Making. Cham: Springer. S. 147-171
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3105-6624 und Osimani, Barbara
(2022):
Pharmacovigilance as Personalized Evidence.
In: Bertolaso, Marta und Canali, Stefano (Hrsg.):
Personalized Medicine in the Making. Cham: Springer. S. 147-171
Duca, Simone und Leitgeb, Hannes
(2012):
How Serious Is the Paradox of Serious Possibility?
In: Mind, Bd. 121, Nr. 481: S. 1-36
Elkin, Lee und Wheeler, Gregory
(2018):
Resolving Peer Disagreements Through Imprecise Probabilities.
In: Nous, Bd. 52, Nr. 2: S. 260-278
[PDF, 190kB]
Eva, Benjamin und Hartmann, Stephan
(21. November 2017):
When No Reason For Is A Reason Against.
[PDF, 178kB]
Fletcher, Samuel C.; Landes, Jürgen und Poellinger, Roland
(23. Juni 2018):
Evidence amalgamation in the sciences: an introduction.
In: Synthese, Bd. 196, Nr. 8: S. 3163-3188
Fletcher, Samuel C.; Landes, Jürgen und Poellinger, Roland (Hrsg.)
(August 2019):
Evidence amalgamation in the sciences.
Synthese, Bd. 196. Cham: Springer.
Haenni, Rolf und Hartmann, Stephan
(2006):
Modeling Partially Reliable Information Sources: A General Approach Based On Dempster-Shafer Theory.
In: Information Fusion, Bd. 7, Nr. 4:
361 - 379
Hartmann, Stephan und Bovens, Luc
(2001):
How to Expand Your Beliefs in an Uncertain World: A Probabilistic Model.
In: Kern-Isberner, Gabriele; Lukasiewicz, Thomas und Weydert, Emil (Hrsg.):
KI-2001 Workshop: Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. S. 287-288
Hartmann, Stephan und Bovens, Luc
(2000):
Bayesian Networks in Epistemology and Philosophy of Science.
In: Pearce, D. et al (Hrsg.):
Scientific Reasoning in AI and Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the Workshop at the Conference.
Hartmann, Stephan und Hajek, Alan
(2010):
Bayesian Epistemology.
In: Dancy, Jonathan; Sosa, Ernest und Steup, Matthias (Hrsg.):
A Companion to Epistemology: Second Edition. Blackwell Companions to Philosophy, Wiley-Blackwell. S. 93-106
Hartmann, Stephan und Rafiee Rad, Soroush
(29. November 2016):
Voting, deliberation and truth.
In: Synthese: S. 1-21
[PDF, 571kB]
Hartmann, Stephan und Sprenger, Jan
(2012):
Judgment Aggregation and the Problem of Tracking the Truth.
In: Synthese, Bd. 187, Nr. 1: S. 209-221
Hartmann, Stephan und Sprenger, Jan
(2010):
Bayesian Epistemology.
In: Bernecker, Sven und Pritchard, Duncan (Hrsg.):
The Routledge Companion to Epistemology. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. S. 609-620
Hawthorne, James; Landes, Jürgen; Wallmann, Christian und Williamson, Jon
(2015):
The Principal Principle Implies the Principle of Indifference.
In: The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
Hawthorne, James; Landes, Jürgen; Wallmann, Christian und Williamson, Jon
(2017):
The Principal Principle Implies the Principle of Indifference.
In: The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Bd. 68, Nr. 1: S. 123-131
Kapsner, Andreas und Sandfuchs, Barbara
(2016):
Reluctant Panopticians: Reply to Sunstein.
In: Review of Philosophy and Psychology: S. 1-7
Klein, Dominik; Gratzl, Norbert und Roy, Olivier
(2015):
Introspection, Normality and Agglomeration.
In: Hoek, Wiebe van der; Holliday, H. Wesley und Wang, Wen-fang (Hrsg.):
Logic, Rationality, and Interaction. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Bd. 9394. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. S. 195-206
Klein, Dominik; Roy, Olivier und Gratzl, Norbert
(9. März 2017):
Knowledge, belief, normality, and introspection.
In: Synthese
[PDF, 444kB]
Landes, Jürgen
(2014):
Evolution and Rationality: Decisions, Co-Operation and Strategic Behaviour.
In: Philosophical Quarterly, Bd. 64, Nr. 255: S. 358-361
Landes, Jürgen
(2014):
Min–max Decision Rules for Choice Under Complete Uncertainty: Axiomatic Characterizations for Preferences Over Utility Intervals.
In: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, Bd. 55, Nr. 5:
1301 - 1317
Landes, Jürgen
(2. Mai 2018):
What’s Hot in Mathematical Philosophy: Pirate Games.
In: The Reasoner, Bd. 12, Nr. 5: S. 41-42
Landes, Jürgen und Masterton, George
(2016):
Invariant Equivocation.
In: Erkenntnis: S. 1-27
[PDF, 485kB]
Landes, Jürgen; Osimani, Barbara und Poellinger, Roland
(16. März 2017):
Epistemology of Causal Inference in Pharmacology. Towards a Framework for the Assessment of Harms.
In: European Journal for Philosophy of Science
Landes, Jürgen; Paris, Jeff B. und Vencovská, Alena
(2011):
A Survey of Some Recent Results on Spectrum Exchangeability in Polyadic Inductive Logic.
In: Synthese, Bd. 181, Nr. 1: S. 19-47
Landes, Jürgen; Paris, Jeff B. und Vencovská, Alena
(2009):
Representation Theorems for Probability Functions Satisfying Spectrum Exchangeability in Inductive Logic.
In: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, Bd. 51, Nr. 1:
35 - 55
Landes, Jürgen und Williamson, Jon
(22. April 2015):
Justifying Objective Bayesianism on Predicate Languages.
In: Entropy, Bd. 17, Nr. 4: S. 2459-2543
Landes, Jürgen und Williamson, Jon
(2016):
Objective Bayesian Nets from Consistent Datasets.
In: AIP Conference Proceedings, Bd. 1757, Nr. 1
[PDF, 304kB]
Landes, Jürgen und Williamson, Jon
(2016):
Objective Bayesian nets from consistent datasets.
In: AIP Conference Proceedings, Bd. 1757, Nr. 1:
020007
Landes, Jürgen und Williamson, Jon
(September 2013):
Objective Bayesianism and the Maximum Entropy Principle.
In: Entropy, Bd. 15, Nr. 9: S. 3528-3591
Leitgeb, Hannes
(2013):
Reducing Belief Simpliciter to Degrees of Belief.
In: Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, Bd. 164, Nr. 12:
1338 - 1389
Leitgeb, Hannes
(2015):
The Humean Thesis on Belief.
In: Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, Bd. 89, Nr. 1: S. 143-185
Leitgeb, Hannes
(2014):
The Review Paradox. A Note on the Diachronic Costs of Not Closing Rational Belief Under Conjunction.
In: Nous, Bd. 48, Nr. 4: S. 781-793
Leitgeb, Hannes
(2014):
The Stability Theory of Belief.
In: The Philosophical Review, Bd. 123, Nr. 2: S. 131-171
Leitgeb, Hannes
(2017):
The Stability of Belief. How Rational Belief Coheres with Probability.
First edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leitgeb, Hannes
(2002):
Metaworlds: A Possible Worlds Semantics of Truth.
In: Halbach, V. und Horsten, L. (Hrsg.):
Principles of Truth. Epistemische Studien, Bd. 1. Frankfurt a. M.: Hänsel-Hohenhausen. S. 129-151
Lyon, Aidan und Pacuit, Eric
(2013):
The Wisdom of Crowds: Methods of Human Judgement Aggregation.
In: Michelucci, Pietro (Hrsg.):
Handbook of Human Computation. Springer. S. 599-614
Osimani, Barbara
(2009):
Modus Tollens Probabilized: Deductive and Inductive Methods in Medical Diagnosis.
In: MEDIC, Bd. 17: S. 43-59
[PDF, 240kB]
Osimani, Barbara
(2014):
Safety vs. efficacy assessment of pharmaceuticals: Epistemological rationales and methods.
In: Preventive Medicine Reports, Bd. 1:
9 - 13
Osimani, Barbara und La Caze, Adam (Hrsg.)
(2016):
Uncertainty in Pharmacology: Epistemology, Methods and Decisions.
: Springer International Publishing.
Osimani, Barbara und Mignini, Fiorenzo
(2015):
Causal assessment of pharmaceutical treatments. Why standards of evidence should not be the same for benefits and harms?
In: Drug Safety, Bd. 38, Nr. 1: S. 1-11
Pedersen, Arthur P. und Wheeler, Gregory
(Oktober 2013):
Demystifying Dilation.
In: Erkenntnis, Bd. 79, Nr. 6: S. 1305-1342
Pedersen, Arthur P. und Wheeler, Gregory
(2015):
Dilation, Disintegrations, and Delayed Decisions.
In: Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Imprecise Probability: Theories and Applications (ISIPTA 2015): S. 227-236
Pfeifer, Niki
(2007):
Rational argumentation under uncertainty.
In: Kreuzbauer, Günther; Gratzl, Norbert und Hiebl, Ewald (Hrsg.):
Persuasion und Wissenschaft: Aktuelle Fragestellungen von Rhetorik und Argumentationstheorie. Wien: LIT-Verlag. S. 181-191
Pfeifer, Niki und Douven, Igor
(2013):
Formal Epistemology and the New Paradigm Psychology of Reasoning.
In: Review of Philosophy and Psychology: S. 1-23
Poellinger, Roland
(2013):
Disentangling Causal Connections and Informational Links.
21st Annual Meeting of the European Society for Philosophy and Psychology, Granada, July 9-12.
Bordonaba, D. und Heras, M. (Hrsg.):
In: Proceedings of the 21st meeting of the European Society for Philosophy & Psychology,
Pretis, Francesco De; Landes, Jürgen und Osimani, Barbara
(2019):
E-Synthesis: A Bayesian Framework for Causal Assessment in Pharmacosurveillance.
In: Frontiers in Pharmacology, Bd. 10, 1317
[PDF, 2MB]
Reutlinger, Alexander und Koch, Heiner
(2008):
Methodological Individualism and the Epistemic Value of Macro-Explanations.
In: Percipi, Bd. 2: S. 1-14
Stewart, Rush T.
(13. Oktober 2017):
Unanimous Consensus Against AGM?
In: Thought: A Journal of Philosophy, Bd. 6, Nr. 4: S. 222-231
[PDF, 272kB]
Tentori, Katya; Crupi, Vincenzo und Russo, Selena
(Februar 2013):
On the Determinants of the Conjunction Fallacy: Probability Versus Inductive Confirmation.
In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Bd. 142, Nr. 1: S. 235-255
Tesic, Marko; Eva, Benjamin und Hartmann, Stephan
(14. August 2017):
Confirmation by Explanation: A Bayesian Justification of IBE.
[PDF, 417kB]
Wheeler, Gregory
(2012):
Objective Bayesian Calibration and the Problem of Non-convex Evidence.
In: The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Bd. 63, Nr. 4: S. 841-850
Wheeler, Gregory
(2012):
Formal Epistemology.
In: Cullison, Andrew (Hrsg.):
The Continuum Companion to Epistemology. Bloomsbury Companions, Bloomsbury. S. 227-247
Wheeler, Gregory
(2014):
Character Matching and the Locke Pocket of Belief.
In: Lihoreau, Franck und Rebuschi, Manuel (Hrsg.):
Epistemology, Context, and Formalism. Springer International Publishing. S. 187-195
Wheeler, Gregory
(2016):
Machine Epistemology and Big Data.
In: McIntyre, Lee und Rosenberg, Alex (Hrsg.):
The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Social Science. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Wheeler, Gregory und Mayo-Wilson, Conor
(Januar 2016):
Scoring Imprecise Credences: A Mildly Immodest Proposal.
In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Bd. 93, Nr. 1: S. 55-78
Wheeler, Gregory und Scheines, Richard
(2013):
Coherence and Confirmation through Causation.
In: Mind, Bd. 122, Nr. 485: S. 135-170